More Live From Summit on Customer Engagement 2009

The Summit on Customer Engagement continues Tuesday, October 21.  From yesterday’s session, here are my takeaways from the panel discussion where Jeff Tinker, SVP Wholesale Product and Market Strategy, Wells Fargo, Asim Zaheer, VP Global Product and Competitive Marketing, Hitachi Data Systems and John Pasquarette, VP of Product Marketing for Software, National Instruments talked about their current, direct experience with customer programs. Bill Lee moderated and took questions from the audience.

What do your customer programs look like and what are the best practices that you see work?

Wells Fargo started by focusing customer engagement programs at the B2B user level, but has shifted more dollars and attention on the decision maker level .  They have built online community destinations that successfully attract users (of small business banking products, for example), but now face the challenge of involving large business decision makers and creating deeper relationships with them online. Right now, customer engagement with decision makers happen offline.  To ensure maximum value for participants, they interview advisory board members before each meeting, synthesize what members want to hear from bank and each other, and facilitate this discussion.

Wells launched user community 2 years ago as a separate site with separate registration.  Flat growth in community membership resulted. Recently, they integrated the community into the main Wells Fargo portal to make the community more accessible.  The Wachovia acquisition, and increased interest in industry-specific topics, led to a doubling in their advisory board numbers. To meet this increased demand, Wells is looking at how to do customer advisory meetings virtually.

Jeff sees written case studies get less interest than in the past; current clients want to interact and ask questions of each other — whether about Wells products, how the merger is going, or a host of other topics.

National Instruments –  which John describes as “the Home Depot for engineers” – produces tools that engineers use to develop and test products. Like Wells, customer engagement with end users is going very well.  Unlike Wells, NI needs to help their salesforce, who are all degreed engineers, to have higher-valued, business-level discussion. NI sees community tools and technology as a way to help resolve this.

John says NI executives, marketing, product managers, etc. spend a lot of time with their key customers. For example, an NI team just spent 2 days onsite with Harris learning how Harris uses their tools to reduce cycle  and test time.  Adoption is critical – once engineers move onto the NI platform, they don’t move off. So references — and demonstrating a vibrant community of like-minded engineers to new prospects —  is key to getting them to become customers in the first place. Customer references and case studies help to build that community identity and following. 

Hitachi Data Systems sells storage solutions to large enterprises, deals topping hundreds of thousands of dollars on average. Asim is accelerating their customer engagement activities to learn about – and adapt to — what customers face in this changing economy. HDS customer advisory boards are high-touch, but now HDS needs to move this activity down stream and engage the midmarket. They are working with TechValidate to see how automation can help them to reach into the midmarket further.

So far, HDS has created about ½ a dozen communities on LinkedIn and is currently montioring how prospects and customers use this social network to share successes and horror stories on a community-by-community basis. Community members know HDS sponsors the LinkedIn groups, but HDS actsl simply as an observer and moderator; they do not actively “participate” on these community pages. Currently, the LinkedIn experiment is not connected to customer reference activity.  Beyond this, HDS hosts gated, online communities. Keys to success with these private communities are: 1) Give the participants something of value that they can’t get elsewhere, 2) keep participation volume high– get more than 2-3 folks talking, and 3) make the feedback mechanism direct to HDS short and uncomplicated. HDS finds good customer references actively come from this community.

What do you do about customers/prospects who complain or make disparaging comments in communities?

Jeff talked about how the principles of good customer support/relationship building applies in the online world just as well as the offline.  You have to talk to the people with complaints or gripes; you can’t ignore them.  Don’t defend, but don’t justify either.  Jeff says, “If we are wrong, we admit it. We respond within 24 hours.” At first Wells’ legal department put together 7 pages of guidelines about how to interact in the community – but the executive sponsor stepped in and said “I want simple terms and conditions; we don’t want to stifle dialog”.

John says NI welcomes disparaging comments. Many times a customer, not an NI employee, jumps in to respond.  NI has changed a policy – or said why they can’t – when the customers bring up issues on the community. We regularly survey our customers on satisfaction, which is the final scoreboard for this activity.  John said, “The community provides one avenue of input to our strategy and direction, but we don’t knee-jerk react to all of it.”

Asim advises “don’t get into arguments with them.” Listen, address the issue, admit mistakes when you make them, and let other customers chime in.

How do you concisely explain the ROI of this activity to your executives and board? Especially when putting forth a budget?

Asim explained that justification is not that big a problem at HDS because HDS executives on down all agree they need and want to talk to customers. Customers are HDS’s biggest asset and customer engagment programs help them grow this investment.  But they do look at both hard-dollar and soft-impacts. For example, when some customers had trouble traveling to executive briefing centers to spend time with HDS engineers and execs, HDS looked at the numbers and found they could afford to take the program on the road.  Visiting a dozen cities for in-depth customer meetings is not cheap, but HDS track deal flow and revenue impacted by these events and has seen a very positive impact.  So much so that they plan to expand the executive briefing center roadshow to more cities in 2010.

Jeff said that Wells definitely increased its level of investment and involvement in customer engagement in 2009. To demonstrate the payoff, they highlight the role customers play in the development of products and how much customer interaction help them reduce time to market for new products. Customers cut the guesswork out of the development process.

Following this panel, Bill Lee hosted a “fireside chat” with Dan Crain, former CTO, Brocade and Tim Thorsteinson, Harris Broadcasting, on the topic of “What do Decision Makers Want from the B2B Relationship?”

Bottomline: Decision makers want trustworthy relationships and relevant discussion about industry topics.  They don’t want to engage in customer programs that are product or transactional in focus.

Dan Crain has bought a lot of IT equipment in his career, and gets invited to customer programs all the time. If sales sponsors them, he’s not interested. If the program is run by product marketing or the technical people, he finds much more value.  The most attractive programs center on discussion around industry-level issues.

Regarding social activity
Dan: “Social media is not good for putting out managed information or messages about your company. It’s more about getting closer to customers.”  Communities are not a new thing: the techn industry has had bulletin boards and forums for a long time.  They are a great way for users to interact, although it is debateable whether the new host of social software tools really enhances this.  Microsoft is a great example of how to use forums to interact with users well. In contrast, Dell putting out coupon codes for refurbished equipment on Twitter is not about getting closer to customers. But listening to customer suggestions and request on Dell IdeaStorm is.

Tim said Harris has used social media to automate getting feedback on products or specific ideas.  He feels it social media is better used for automating a focus group than blasting out messages to the community on social channels.

Tim and Dan agree: Buyers who select a vendor to work with want that vendor to be successful. So executives and decision makers will take time to provide references or to participate in customer advisory.

Making Your B2B Marketing Work — Better!

A worldwide recession and social media have swept up B2B marketers in a perfect storm, tossed between tighter budgets and the demand to do more online without guideposts or established benefits. Opportunities and challenges abound for marketers targeting other businesses through a direct sales force or channel partners. Before 2010 planning — and the push to pump up the pipeline to make year-end revenue goals — hit full stride, now is an excellent time to step outside your daily routine, tune up B2B marketing strategy, and learn new best practices.

Sound intriguing? If so, have I got a deal for you!  (Oh, c’mon, you suspected a pitch was coming, now didn’t you?)

On September 17, 2009 (Thursday) I am leading a full-day workshop in Cambridge, MA on “Making B2B Marketing Work”. This workshop brings B2B marketing peers together to explore and discuss how marketing has changed in light of the digital/social media shift and the pressures imposed by the current economy. It will help you think through a number of issues — how to stretch budget dollars by better integrating digital and physical tactics, tap into social media, drive healthier pipelines, target and qualify your best customers, and create a marketing technology infrastructure that increases efficiency through automation – just to name a few of the top takeaways. You will also gain hands-on experience assessing your integrated marketing accumen and lead management maturity while hearing “tricks of the trade” from our expert panel (who join us at the end of the day.)

You may want to check out Forrester’s site for further workshop details if you need answers to the following questions:

  • How do I optimize my marketing mix in 2010?
  • What are the best practices for generating, and managing, demand?
  • How do I better integrate digital and social media into my campaigns?
  • How do I improve marketing’s working relationship with sales?
  • How do I make my Web site generate better leads?
  • What are the best social media tactics to use?
  • What technology investments should I make in 2010?

In my rather “un-humble” opinion, I’ve found participants feel that the two best features of this workshop are:

1) Networking and interpersonal interaction. The workshop is intimate (typically between 7 adn 15 participants) which gives you the opportunity to spend time with peers (and the analyst, of course!) talking about what matters to you and how you have been making B2B marketing work. Participants from Tech and non-Tech industries share experiences and learn from each others’ successes and mistakes.

2) Talking with the panel of experts.  Plan to stick around to enjoy the wine/cheese reception for further networking and to meet with our expert panel. I’m gathering the invitees now, but past participants included experts in search marketing, community development, demand generation, and marketing automation. The discussion is lively and really gets to the heart of “what should you do in practice to make B2B marketing work?”

Will you join me?  Hope to see you there!

Change Management: The Key to Successful Marketing Process

Digital marketing is a double-edged sword for B2B marketers making it a bigger part of their marketing mix. On the one side, digital is more targetable, addressable, and measurable than traditional channels like advertising, promotions, and tradeshows. Online, marketing now has more data to help them “know” more about prospects and buyers. On the other hand, the options available in the marketing mix have exploded and executives want to hold marketing more accountable for program results and campaign spend. Given these turbulent times, marketing challenges increase exponentially and marketing automation moves from a “nice to have” to “essential” investment. But technology implemented without a clear understanding of process typically gets many marketers into hot water. Face it, many of us have tremendous experience running campaigns and programs, but little experience with the change management needed to move process from ad hoc to repeatable and disciplined.

The August quarterly MOCCA meeting looked a little closer at the marketing operations community experience implementing process. Brenda Kring, Director of Demand Generation for CyberSource (who hosted the meeting) and Membership and Content Chair for the MOCCA steering committee, presented the results from the July association survey on marketing process. The audience then listened to a panel share their stories on how change management impacts processes, automation, applications and people and talk about the specific challenges each experienced rolling out automation. The conversation and questions reinforced for me how minor a role technology selection plays in operationalizing marketing and how automating poor process only results in long term problems.

Here are a few of the findings from the survey that stood out:

1) Process is important, but not approached in a systematic way. Of the 36 members who responded, 2/3 said they only apply process rigorously in a few key areas. Just 6% said they had a “very process-oriented culture” where they worked. Of those who implemented process, 2/3 said they did not use a formal methodology or defined their own as they went along.

2) Top management must push change. 44% of respondents said the key factor that led to a successful implementation top executives drive change from the top. 30% said getting stakeholder buy-in was essential. This underlines how people is the essential ingredient in change management, and marketing is no exception to this rule.

3) Marketing operations wants more accountability in process change. Almost 80% of respondents said their experience with process change was neutral or unsuccessful. Integrating accountability – making sure folks adhere to the new process or changed state – was the change 29% of respondents said they would make in retrospect. (This would also relieve executive management from spending times getting the troops lined up and marching in the right direction.)

(A few statistics about this group of respondents:  72% hail from the tech industry, 61% are in firms over 1000 employees, and 53% work at companies that earned $1 billion or more in revenue — so a very interesting sampling, especially to my research.)

If you’d like to see more information about the survey, check out the MOCCA and look up the Q3 meeting. I’d be interested to hear what you think are the top issues that keep marketers from implementing process successfully. What do you think achieves – or holds back – success in marketing process automation and change management?

(Disclosure: I back-dated this post to correspond closer to the timing of the meeting.  Sorry folks, just so much to do!)

Diana Huff Thinks I’m a Smart Woman to Follow on Twitter!

Wow!  I am humbled and honored to find myself in such amazing company! Thank you Dianna, it’s great to get noticed.

At the risk of revealing a gap in my social acuity, I have to confess that I missed this event entirely.  At the end of July, I was enjoying some time off from Forrester with my family and (maybe no surprise) was not paying attention to social media at all.  It wasn’t until August 20 (I’m backdating this post) that Tina Stewart, Juniper Networks social maven, pointed out Dianna’s post.  (Thank you, Tina).

However belatedly, I must say that I am thrilled to share the stage with luminaries such as Sandy Carter, Ann Handley, Jill Konrath, and Anne Holland. In particular, I’m so pleased to see my high school classmate Ardath Albee on the list.  Ardath and I got reacquainted about 2 1/2 years ago when she replied to a post I authored on Forrester’s fledgling Interactive Marketer blog. I emailed her separately to find out that she indeed was the person I knew from our high school speech and debate team. I continue to follow Ardath’s journey as an expert on creating meaningful marketing interactions (she’s in my blog roll — lower left on this page – if you’d like to do the same).

Congratulations to all of the wonderful women Diana highlighted and to all the others who continue to make the online world an interesting and productive place to spend time.  Great job, ladies!

In looking over the list, here are three more women (in no particular order) who you should consider putting on your top list to follow on Twitter:

Charlene Li - Co-author of Groundswell and founder of the Altimeter Group, Charlene has probably done more to advance social computing than anyone else in the blogosphere. I miss her insight and companionship at Forrester, but know she is doing terrific work independently. As the Altimeter Group expands — and anticipating Charlene’s upcoming book on Open Leadership– I expect to continue to see great ideas and passionate debate from her.

Rebekah E Donaldson – I met “Red” about two years ago as I started to chart Web 2.0 and social waters.  Rebekah is an expert in B2B marketing services, particularly around inbound marketing services such as Web, email, search marketing, and social media, along with traditional marketing techniques, and has built a lively consulting business in the Sacramento, California area – which makes her my sounding board when I need a perspective outside tech-centric Silicon Valley.  I owe her a debt of gratitude for help in shaping my thoughts about avoiding obsolescence in B2B marketing.

Debbie Weil - is a corporate blogging and social media expert, online marketing consultant, and author of “The Corporate Blog”. She’s great fun to listen to as well. I follow Debbie on Twitter and look forward to meeting her in person some day.

See You At Forrester’s Marketing Forum – April 23, 24 in Orlando

Forrester Markting Forum 2009: Orlando, Florida

Forrester Markting Forum 2009: Orlando, Florida

 

 

Tomorrow marks the start of Forrester’s third annual Marketing Forum.  I am thrilled to be presenting here on three key topics, but I have to admit that this forum still feels more like “Consumer Forum Redux” for my B2B-centric tastes. (Forrester hosts a  forum targeting retail, CPG, customer experience professionals in the fall — and has for years. I feel like there’s more content and topic overlap between the two events than there should be to strongly differentitate them.)

Overall, Forrester does a decent job of addressing B2C and B2B audiences in a single venue. It’s intimate: 300+ attendees and we invite our FLB members to spend quality time together the day before the conference kicks off. Maybe the problem is this: I’m not seeing a lot of events, forums, or community sites dedicated exclusively to the CMO/executive marketer in B2B. Where is the content and interactions that deal with issues like fitting social media in the B2B marketing mix, sales alignment/support best practices, managing demand and nurturing leads, measuring marketing impact when a sales force is involved, and setting marketing strategy in a product-driven environment?   I’m not seeing much; are you?

Here are some of the session topics we will offer (well, me, in particular) to benefit B2B marketers:

1) How B2B Direct Marketers Are Weathering The Current Economic Storm. My buddy Dave Frankland, who covers database marketing services and direct marketing best practices, and  I are teaming up to put this question to top marketers from United Stationers, Avocent, Analog Devices, and Microsoft. We’ll tackle an interesting blend of tech, non-tech, enterprise and SMB issues in this discussion.

2) The Social Technographics of Business and IT Decision MakersOliver Young and I will take a deeper dive into the tech buyer social behavior survey we ran earlier this year, that I blogged about previously. This session looks to answer the “so what” question for B2B marketers wanting to know how to engage with socially active technology buyers. (We spent a full day with a group of B2B marketers today working through the ins and outs of setting social strategy.  Too bad the workshop didn’t FOLLOW the forum session… I’ll work to get that right the next time.)

3) Community Marketing: A New Discipline For Shaping Business Marketing Leadership.  Presenting with Peter Burris, I think I’m most excited about this presentation. Pete and I will look at how social media, and the social Web, will reshape the “4 Ps” of marketing and what B2B marketers should do now to capitalize on these fundamental changes and come out ahead when the economy turns around.

4) Catching The Next Wave: Emerging Markets And SMBs Will Rise From the SandsJennifer Belissent and Tim Harmon are teaming up to look at why non-US, non-Euro, and SMB firms will be the first to break out of the current, worldwide economic slump.  Interesting implications for B2B marketers who target emerging geographies and firms with less than 100 employees.

5) Strategic Sales Enablement: Rethinking Traditional Siloed Product, Marketing, and Sales Relationships To Compete In the New Economy.  Hold onto your hats: Scott Santucci and Eric Brown team up to argue that marketing should better engineer sales conversations that help close business faster and easier.  Probably a talk the VP of Sales will appreciate more than the CMO, but the perspective is particularly provocative for firms with long-standing sales/marketing conflicts.

The one key note that I would love to see (but will likely miss due to customer 1-1 meetings) is Craig Dewar, Director of Community Marketing at Microsoft, talk about Driving B2B Customer Engagement Through Community. I hope his content turns out to be as thought-provoking and insightful as it sounds. It risks becoming cheerleading form yet another community marketing enthusiast hyping that every company should create its own communities as the “the future” of firm-to-buyer communications.

Over the next couple of days, I’ll capture my reactions to the forum here and give you a taste of the event from my (atypical?) B2B perspective. You can compare it to posts from my Forrester colleagues who will blog their impressions as well.  Or follow the proceedings on Twitter by searching for the #FMF09 tweets.

In the meantime, let me know which venues, associations, blogs, community pages, etc. you find particularly useful for the B2B executive marketer. I’m interested in hearing your thoughts on this topic and how Forrester could better capture attention in this arena.

What’s in a Name: the Story Behind “B2B Marketing POSTs”

My 16-year-old son told me my blog has a boring name. He suggested that I call it the “Do what I say or your marketing will fail” blog.  Or the “Listen to me or I’ll yell at you some more about your pitiful marketing” blog. (You can tell he has a unique perspective about my life as an analyst. He finds it interesting that I “tell” people what to do for a living. Not that I help or advise folks. Says something about my style as viewed through his teenage — and tireless subject of my parenting– lens.)

I hate naming things.  I let my husband choose the kids’ names. I hated naming as a product marketing manager and I still hate it today. I’m not good at catchy or clever; I’m excellent at analysis, getting the details right, seeing the big picture, product differentiation, and translating tech to business.  But naming? Yuck!  So coming up with a name for my blog was a real challenge. Here was my thought process on the matter:

1) B2B marketing is essential. Professionally, I’m all about marketing enterprise-level, highly-considered, business-oriented stuff.  Don’t have much experience with consumer product marketing and, frankly, couldn’t care less to about it.  Figuring out how to position, message, and deliver technology for line of business audiences is my passion. B2B is the short-cut I adopted to refer to all of that.

2) A name should last the test of time. I’m a research analyst for Forrester writing about B2B marketing best practices today. I have been a software product marketer for 10+ years prior to that. Where will I go next?  Who knows! But I wanted my blog name to grow along with me.  Something like the “B2B Marketing Times” of the “B2B Marketing Post” — paying homage to those time-honored names of publications people recognize as “the place” to go for the news and straight story on B2B marketing.

3) Tip my hat to social media. I believe social computing has — and will continue to — profoundly change how people communicate and engage with each other. There’s no putting this genie back in the bottle, to echo a trite, but true, sentiment. Rather than focus on the media, however, I picked “post” over “times” because individual blog entries are called posts and POST is the term we coined here at Forrester to describe a simple, straightforward methodology for setting marketing strategy.

So I managed to be a bit clever in the end, although I swear creative naming is still not my strong suit.  Unfortunately, this has done little to impress my son. He rolls his eyes. The name explanation has done little to diminish my dorkiness or raise my standing in his world view.

Thank goodness he’s not in the “P” people (audience) for my blog and my objective is not to change the nature of my relationship with him via my posts. I use this blog to amplify and echo my research and thinking around B2B marketing — not to reflect (except on occasion) about the challenges of raising a teenager. If only B2B marketing were as easy. . .

B2B Marketing: Obsolete? Not Yet!

I am an advocate for excellence in business marketing. I don’t believe for a minute that the marketing profession will disappear any time soon. But I think it’s possible for marketing to assume a much diminished role at the executive table as sales, development, service and support use technology to connect directly with prospects and current customers. Social Computing and Tech Populism provide the evidence that this risk is real.

I raised a few eyebrows and stirred a few passions when I first posted on this topic. Here is the second post in the series on obsolescence, which begins to address the changes B2B marketers need to make, and make soon:

Will B2B Marketing Become Obsolete? (Part II) - October 24, 2008

Wow.  I am overwhelmed by the response I received from my first post on this subject. Looks like I hit a nerve and inspired some great commentary.  In particular, I’d like to call attention to the thoughful response from Arthur Einstein, who is the VP of Marketing at Loyalty Builders. I wanted to comment briefly on what I am hearing from all of you so far. To avoid obsolescence, readers believe B2B marketers must focus on:

1) Improving customer insight. Business buyers are people, not faceless companies. Rational decisions get clouded by emotions, motivations, and desires. B2B marketers must stop pushing out communications and start listening to what buyers need. Customer research, segmentation, understanding the buying process, and creating relevant information that engages prospects in conversations — and ultimately long-lasting relationships — all require marketers to understand their customers deeply. This includes gathering and analyzing factual, behavioral, and social information.  Most marketing organizations are woefully underinvested in the technology, processes, and skills needed to do this right.

2) Managing demand, not just trying to generate it. B2B marketing and selling involves supplier teams interacting with buyer teams. This means fostering multiple interactions that evolve in a nonlinear fashion to build relationships and success. It require sales and marketing to work together to give buyers the unvarnished information they need to make a well-considered selection.  This also means all parts of the selling organization need to get more involved in educating and nurturing demand. When marketers deliver fewer, but more qualified leads that sales can act upon, then marketing’s value becomes tangible and strategic to the business. Bottomline: there isn’t an unlimited amount of demand out there to draw upon, so marketers need to figure out which ones to invest in to grow into a relationship.

3) Embracing the social groundswell. Buyers have turned to peers for advice for 100 years; social computing simply extends and supports this behavior. Buyers also mistrust advertising and messaging because marketing has been too focused on feeds, speeds, and fluffy claims — not on value, evidence, and real solutions. Good news: Readers are optimistic that social media, and Web 2.0 tools, offer new opportunities for marketers to correct these past mistakes and use social activity to build relationships that are essential to effective B2B marketing.

To this list, I would also say B2B marketers must learn how to: 4) integrate online and offline communication to better create dialogue and learn more about customer needs and 5) use technology to quantitatively measure, test, and report on marketing activity and the progress of building relationships. Automation will drive the efficiency that wards off obsolesence.

Stay tuned for Part III of exploring how B2B marketers can avoid obsolesence…

Tags: , , :: Add to del.icio.us

——————————

Avoiding obsolescence is not about grabbing onto new tactics or technologies in an attempt to rise above the landslide of messages bombarding buyers every day.  Goodness knows the Web 2.0 world provides an abundance of these tools and the hype to make everyone feel you must jump in immediately or get left in the dust.  It’s not about finding the next unique gimmick or chasing the next eye-catching fad. It’s about making marketing relevant to buyers, and — as a result — to the business. 

Despite rumors to the contrary, buyers have not lost their senses or their trust in conventional marketing communication channels. In our recent research, business publications and sales people follow close behind peers/word of mouth and the Web site as the primary sources of information buyers use when validating purchase decisions. The challenge for B2B marketers has been, is, and will always be finding productive ways to put concise information in front a well-segmented and targeted audience so they will look over and say, “yes, I would like to talk to you about that further.” Delivering messages, information, and offers through marketing that blends traditional channels with digital, social approaches works most effectively when it creates conversation, not just shouts through the bullhorn.

With marketing budgets under tight financial scrutiny, it’s time for B2B marketers to account for their true impact on the business. Otherwise, becoming simply the “make it pretty department” is right around the corner.

How Do Business Buyers Engage Socially?

Forrester analysts Josh Bernoff and Charlene Li published our business best seller, Groundswell, last year. The book captured marketer, community manager, social strategist, executive and enthusiast attention alike. Long on B2C examples, however, readers sometimes wondered “how much of this applies to B2B marketing?” and “how much does social participation carry over into the working world?”  I’m happy to say “quite a bit” to both questions.

Tomorrow, my colleague Oliver Young and I will present a preview of upcoming research on how business decision makers participate in social activity. Here’s what I had to say about it on Forrester’s Interactive Marketing blog:

How Do B2B Buyers Participate Socially? – February 11, 2009

My colleague Josh Bernoff lit the social computing world on fire last year when Forrester published Groundswell, which Josh co-authored with Charlene Li, now heading up Altimeter Group. Groundswell introduces marketers, community managers, and social enthusiasts to Social Technographics – a method for describing describe a population according to its participation in social activity. You can interact with our online tool on the Groundswell site to learn more about how this profiling works.

B2B marketers see this and ask, “Does this behavior translate into the working world?” Interactive marketers want to know how truly engaged business buyers are in social activity to gauge how much time, effort, and commitment they need to put in emerging social media versus other, more traditional marketing tactics. We analysts at Forrester can help by drawing analogies using our knowledge of consumer behavior, but we didn’t have the data to profile exactly how business buyers participate socially.

Until now.

Tomorrow (Feb 12 at 11:30 am ET), Oliver Young and I will preview the results of Forrester research into the social participaton of B2B buyers — folks involved in technology decision making at firms with 100 employees or more, in 5 major geographic regions, and across 7 major industry groups. The Webinar will touch on the results from over 1200 survey responses showing B2B buyers lead active social lives and a good portion — but not all — of this behavior happens while on the job.

If you’d like to learn more, register here.  Feel free to pass this offer along to your friends and colleagues too. It’s free and open to non-Forrester clients. Space is limited however.

Watch this space, and my blog for B2B marketers, for more on this as we unveil the accompanying research report and start talking more about how marketers can use this information to inform their social media strategy and marketing mix.

Tags: , , :: Add to del.icio.us

—————–

Personally, I hope you can join us…this is the start of a lot of great research and insight that will help B2B marketers ride the wave of the social media groundswell.

Welcome to my blog for B2B marketers!

Confucius is credited with saying, “A journey of a thousand miles begins with a single step.”  Welcome to my first step on a journey of sharing, ruminating on, and learning about smart business-to-business (B2B) marketing practices.

I am into my 8th year as an analyst at Forrester Research.  During the past three and a half, I have built up a body of research, writing, and one-on-one experience talking about how technology impacts the process and practices of marketing highly-considered, negotiated, expensive products through a direct sales force and channel partners.  I’ve surveyed over 1500 B2B marketers, interviewed over 250 personally, and worked with top companies like Adobe, Cisco, HP, IBM, McGraw-Hill, Microsoft, and many more.  Prior to Forrester, I have been a high technology marketer myself, so I know what it is like to walk in those shoes, not just to write about it.

It’s a very busy job; so why start a blog? 

Because I’d like to explore more issues and ideas than I can fit into the 15 or so research reports I publish at Forrester yearly. I would also like to develop a community of like-minded readers, who may or may not follow my Forrester research, willing to join in a conversation occassionally about what it takes to market exceptionally well in a constantly changing, challenging environment. I am not sure where this journey of 1000 miles will lead — or how long it will take to get through the first mile — but I know that many interesting questions about demand generation, lead management, sales enablement, and using social media to build a community of advocates need answers and debate.

Will you join me?  I hope so and welcome all comments that are on topic and on target.  As the sole author of this blog, the views expressed here are mine alone and do not necessarily reflect those of my employer, Forrester Research.  However, I want to remain true to Forrester’s guiding principle of objectivity so reserve the right to remove an occasional comment that I feel is off the mark, too commercial, profane, or downright spam. Other than that, I look forward to exploring the key issues that concern business marketers today and leaving a legacy of information that future marketers will find useful.

Thanks for reading.  I look forward to the journey together.