Looking Over The Lead Management Automation Market

Despite the current economy, small firms in the lead management automation space continue to spring up.  Recently I spoke with founders and spokespeople from Neolane (not new, but not on my radar until now), eTrigue, LeadLife, and Kineticast.  These are but a few of the seemingly burgeoning ranks of companies who have found seed, angel, or VC money and now look to offer solutions that help marketers better manage demand when it comes in the door.

I will be writing more about this in my Forrester research next quarter, but if you have a question or comment about any of these firms in the meantime, let me know.  I also talked about this market space last year; here is what I said:

B2B Lead Management Market Heats Up — 3/30/2008

Since the start of this year, I’ve been receiving a boatload of briefing requests from companies wanting to show me their lead generation and management solutions.  Most recently, Marketo just announced their lead management solution. While honored, I also find reviewing these solutions confusing because there is a lot of variation in the product presentations and overlap between categories.  And it’s not clear to me if lead management automation deserves to be a separate category or to be subsumed as part of the broader marketing platform. (I know Suresh Vittal includes lead management as a component of his enterprise marketing platform. But does the B2B need the same platform components as B2C?) Here’s how I see it and I’d like to hear your views as well.

There are four primary buckets of technology solutions aimed at solving the “how do I make lead generation activities more effective?” problem:

1) Web analytics – typically the stronghold of companies like Coremetrics, Omniture, and WebTrends, the analytics area bleeds over into lead management as companies go online to generate demand.  Many of the marketing automation companies have added some fairly sophisticated analytics to monitor prospect’s online behavior and help marketers qualify and score them based on Web site visits, registrations, and downloads.

2) Database services – powerhouses like Dun&Bradstreet, Harte-Hanks, Acxiom, Equifax, infoUSA, and Merkle dominate this category, but B2B marketers tend to think of them more as list generators than providers of a broad spectrum of strategic data management to direct mail execution. My point: B2B marketers are looking elsewhere for help generating demand.

3) Marketing automation – lead by firms like Aprimo, Unica, Oracle/Siebel and SAS, this category is at the core of what Forrester calls the Marketing Technology Backbone.  The problem is: these platforms are heavy on campaign design, execution, and reporting and light on lead management.

4) “Pure play” lead management – this group is lead by Eloqua, but there are a LOT of firms throwing their hat into this ring including Vtrenz, Hubspot, Manticore, Market2Lead, Marketo, LoopFuse, einsof, iHance, Precience, among many others. (That I’m sure to hear about them since I know I’ve missed adding many to this list.)

Here’s the problem. There are at least 4 amorphous groups of solution providers also setting their sights on this space:

1) Lead generation services or tools – Because this category contains both service providers (that look more like agencies or telesales outsourcers) and software as a service vendors, there are probably more than I could possibly name.  Recently, I’ve heard from companies like Bulldog Solutions, InsideView, Jigsaw, netFactor, Reachforce, PointClear, Genius, Leads360, among others. Folks, at less than 20 employees, many of you look more like boutique agencies than true technology providers. Positioning yourselves as “lead management” does not help differentiate what you REALLY do.

2) Email services – Julie Katz at Forrester writes about this group.  The lead management vendors are developing one-to-one email capabilities that help sales people be more consistent and productive.  In B2B, it’s not about batch-and-blast acquisition as much as it is about using email to continue a conversation.

3) Search engine marketing services providers – Shar VanBoskirk covers this market, but I’ve found companies like Reprise Media, IMPAQT, iCrossing and iProspect doing a lot more to help B2B marketers understand how to turn search optimization or paid clicks into qualified leads. Tools that analyze who’s clicking – and help B2B marketers make heads or tails out of Google’s analytics – are bleeding over into the lead management space.

4) Online portals – I know, this is a broad category.  But I’m thinking about firms like Business.com, TechTarget, Buyerzone, and a ton of others who syndicate content, host catalogs, attract eyeballs, and offer to “sell” these leads.

Whew!  Lots of stuff, huh? So here’s the two big questions:  When do you use which? (or a combination of the choices?) And will the lead management market continue to grow in addition to – or despite – the plethora of offerings hovering around it?

My bet is on lead management growth because B2B marketers need to fully embrace online marketing as their primary way to engage and educate buyers. They need a platform that fits together with their CRM/SFA systems but separately helps them to identify and sort the best leads from the rest and to nurture those not yet ready to buy.  B2B marketers also need systems that help them align sales activity and marketing messages, monitor marketing’s impact on the pipeline, and close the loop on closed deals.  I think the lead management platforms hit directly on these problems and will shift marketing’s role from filling the pipeline to managing the customer lifecycle.

———

Of course, the vendors had to weigh in on this post.  I suspect they will do the same when I publish the market overview later this year — stay tuned.

13 Responses to “Looking Over The Lead Management Automation Market”

  1. Continuing Our Conversation: Loopfuse CEO Chat, Part II « B2B Marketing POSTs by Laura Ramos Says:

    [...] to tactic, B2B marketers can fail to demonstrate marketing’s impact beyond campaign execution. Lead management automation helps marketers get a handle on the marketing mix and to learn which approaches work at which points [...]

  2. Lead Management Automation: Market Overview In The Works « B2B Marketing POSTs by Laura Ramos Says:

    [...] it comes to marketing automation, B2B marketers need technology specifically geared around capturing demand and qualifying it for sales attention. However, picking the solution best positioned to deliver on lead management [...]

  3. New Sales Tools Increase Alignment Between Sales and Marketing « B2B Marketing POSTs by Laura Ramos Says:

    [...] Tools Increase Alignment Between Sales and Marketing June 15, 2009 — Laura Ramos The lead management automation vendors have been busy. In March, Genius announced Genius Enterprise and broadened their scope from sales [...]

  4. Engago Team Says:

    There is another category: web analytics for B2B: These web services reveal the company name of the visitor and indicate the interest and level of interest of the visitor or company. LEADSExplorer

  5. Pirsey Says:

    I read your posts for a long time and should tell that your posts are always valuable to readers.

  6. Digital Body Language: Steve Wood’s On B2B Marketing « B2B Marketing POSTs by Laura Ramos Says:

    [...] no secret that I’m a fan of lead management automation and firms like Eloqua that bring this technology to market. But looking beyond the technology [...]

  7. Perry Says:

    There are also plenty of lead management programs these days that can help you perform almost all of the basic functions, from lead gathering to lead scoring. Yet businesses should also make sure that they can train their salespeople to use these technologies, such as you’ve mentioned, to their fullest potential.

  8. Jim Meyer Says:

    Your insights are inline with what we are seeing as customers/clients go through an evolution in their phases of growth. Both in their company growth focusing more on scale of leads as a means of generating initial awareness, or for rollouts – as well as in their changes to focus on nurturing and in turbulent times on doing more with less. Less staff, less time, less money to accomplish more sales quicker. As the customer market expands to a broader awareness of needs/capabilities of what is possible, so does the wide separation of people who are just dipping their toes and those who really need second or third generation solutions as they need to be able to accomplish much more with less. And really cant afford an entire team to support their initiatives. From our hockey stick growth, we believe our recent releases of eTrigue are focused on the latter – those who need both power to scale and an ability to run comprehensive plays without a team of rocket scientists in the back room. We would love the opportunity to share a view of our monthly enhancement releases of eTrigue and be included in your upcoming review. Here is a recent case study on growth of customer experience and needs within Cisco and how their quality of leads and sales have grown 25% – http://tinyurl.com/bmcu89

  9. Laura Ramos Says:

    Thanks Jep. Appreciate your tracking my blog and for posting the link to yours. Let me check with my blog folks and figure out how to disable the pingback snippets. I don’t mind the pingbacks — I’m glad for the cross referencing with other like-minded folks. The machine generated stuff is just hard to read. Thanks again.

  10. Jep Castelein Says:

    Hi Laura, sorry for these snippets. I think they are so-called ‘pingbacks’ which are automatically generated when I link to your blog or to any other WordPress-powered blog. If you want, you can disable all pingbacks for your blog (settings > discussion > 2nd check box) or do it post-by-post.

    I think this post has a lot of useful information, and makes it easier to understand the various types of marketing systems and services. I personally find the marketing automation market quite confusing, but I guess that is normal for any rapidly changing market. I put an initial writeup on my blog, and there’s been a whole bunch of insightful comments from both marketers and vendors. This is the link: http://www.leadsloth.com/blog/what-is-a-demand-generation-system/

  11. Laura Ramos Says:

    Jep, feel free to post comments in full sentences instead of snippets. Not sure what happened here, but would love to see your thoughts in whole. Good stuff on your blog, happy to point folks to it.

  12. Shawn Naggiar Says:

    Great read. We fit into the above mentioned category of smaller firms springing up. Act-On is financed by Cisco Systems and we would be very interested in being part of your research/ getting on the radar.
    Jep did a mini review earlier this week: http://www.leadsloth.com/blog/act-on-review-demand-generation-webinar-integration

  13. Christopher Doran Says:

    I like the framework you use to breakdown the space, Laura. The bottomline is there’s a lot of cross-over between the vendors, solution sets. In order for marketers to chose the type of solution that’s right for their needs, they need to develop their own needs framework over the next 12-18 months and map that with the solution framework you layed out above.


Leave a Reply